Le mie opinioni espresse cosi come mi vengo se vi va le leggete se no ... no.

My ideas and consideration(s) if care read them if not I don't care.

 

The sliding door effect …

Every day we take thousands decisions, some of them are minor like what to drink tea or coffee? Others are more relevant and involve our interactions with other human being. For every decision our brain is presenting us millions, billions of relevant facts store I our memory, some times the facts have a consolidated history some other times they don’t.

 

I know I like coffee more than tea, this is also confirmed by the number of them I had enjoy in the past, a number that is significantly higher than the teas I had. But I know as well that I prefer a good tea to a mediocre coffee.

As such when I choose what to drink, my brain presents me all the information regarding my taste, my past experiences, my geographic location (am I in a place where the coffee is god or not), finally it analyzes the information related to that specific moment. Is the guy at the coffee machine doing good or he looks not really on the subject?

 

As said, billions on information to recover, analyze and present in seconds or less than that. For a coffee!!!

 

Guess what, in our day we have to take decisions that are much more complex than that, and unless you are totally nuts, you do not use a coin to decide what to do.

 

To make things even worse, the more you grow, the more your data bank expand, the more your brain has material to choose coffee or tea.

In some case that will make the decision faster, in other it will make it much, much longer.

 

On top of that there are millions of decisions that, let say it, do not count.

Nothing will change in your life if you choose the tea instead of coffee, unless … Well unless that is one of the “sliding door” moment.

 

What is a “sliding door” moment? If you have seen the movie with Gwyneth Paltrow in 1998, you already know, if not I will explain in a second.

 

There are few moments in our life where a series of possible events converge, they normally converge in very simple day by day action, but the context is not the usual.

Something sounds strange, something is different. Most of the time when this happens we do not realize it right away, we do after.

Those are the moment where we say to ourselves, “What if?”.

 

What if instead decide to prune a small branch of that tree I had decided to … don’t do it.

Well I would not injury my neck with the risk to remain paraplegic for the rest of my life, and I would not marry my first wife, and … So on and on and on.

In short, my life would had been totally different, ONLY IF.

 

Why I am saying all this? Because recently I had found myself in front of three of the most difficult questions I had to answer. That in combination with a series of events that bring me to raise my old antennas, and perceive, more then see that I was going to hit one “sliding door” moment.

The questions in discussion are something that in one or another moment in our life we had already face.

Well at least I did.

But all together in this specific moment of my life, they had a totally different impact and meaning.

 

The questions are:

  • Do you know who you are?
  • Do you understand what has happened to you?
  • Do you want to live this way?

What was interesting for me was and still is, that those questions, raise in the exact moment in which I was in front of my “sliding door” moment. In that exact moment I realized that my brain, who was filling me with information and driving me to take one decision or another, simply stops. It stops to push, stop to provide suggestions, it focus on NOT to give an answer. It focuses on NOT making that moment, a “sliding door” one.

 

I could stay days, or seconds now analyzing the data and try to make a better decision. That moment is gone, and this is good.

 

It is good because I can now first answer to more important and relevant questions.

Who am I (now, after X years)?

How it can be that I am here, what really happened to ME ( I mean the “ME”)

Is this the life I had choose to live, or I had left it to bring me in a different place?

 

Not the first time I raise these questions to myself, but I have to say, this time is different. As mentioned before, we often raise one of them to our attention, and we provide an answer. Evaluate what to do and so on.

It also may happen that we ask all three of them, in a moment that is a moment, but not a “sliding door” moment.

 

I had hit that special situation, and my “sliding door” moment become, not to choose A or B, but between ignore the questions or take them, accept that they will, once more, oblige me to change the direction of my life.

 

I know what to do, and in many ways I am scare, because in order to DO IT, I have to go to the longer road, I need to have a lot of courage, and once more be ready for the difficult moments that for sure will come.

But this is life.

 

The only thing I can say, is life is courage, and there is more courage in being honest when answering the above questions, than in performing any scaring or extreme activity.

 

I am writing all this, to share, share an important moment, and take the opportunity to raise to all of you my friends three simple questions:

  • Do you know who you are?
  • Do you understand what has happened to you?
  • Do you want to live this way?

 

eye-of-god-in-blue-10First of all I should have wrote this in Italian, because English it is not my mother tongue and as such I will not be as clear as I would like, and probably I will not be able to use all the terms I am in desire to.

But if I write this in Italian I know that only one, may be two people will get what I am talking about. In English the hope is to have at least 4 or 5 that will be able to follow.

 

 

 

 

 

Preface

Normally in any book or article that talk about something complex, the final idea or conclusion is relegate to the end, while the whole write is mainly focus on explaining the reasoning that leads the writer to that.

I will not follow it, and in fact I will start with what should be the conclusion.

 

What about God

God doesn’t exist, easy as that, period.

Why God does not exist is another discussion. The first point is to understand a very easy concept, society culture, religions and history had taught us to think to God as something existing, but that at the same time it is over-existence.

 

So in some way we were lead to think that God, is some entity, existing but not as we do, existing in a different scale of time, space, dimension and realization.

God represent the point from which existence starts, from which all the things that are begin.

This with a very good level of generalization is the mantra that all the religions repeat to everybody from when the time starts.

Having spent 37 years studying religions, philosophy and science I can see that this common focal point is, to be explicit, bullshit.

 

If God is, then there is a moment when God is not. If God is the source of everything, then there must be a nothing that is not God, and so on we can review one by one all the pillars of almost all religions and find that the basic concept is mainly his own contradiction.

So what about God? If we stop to think to God as entity or as existing than we are on the right path. The hyper-idea of what is and what is not, of time and no time of potential and act, is what could be the more close definition of God, but given a definition will include something that can be out of it than the term is, again, not correct.

 

The hyper-idea concept is something difficult for the human mind to understand, because we are lead to think following a line of time. While here to feel what I mean you should perceive the time as a whole and not as a moment.

You can perceive the heat of the sun, but that is not the sun “per se” also if it is the sun.

The hyper-idea includes what it is and what it is not; given it hyper as such it is and is not at the same time, given time is and is not as well.

The hyper-idea (HI) must include all and exclude all at the same time. Just to clarify with a simple example. HI must include the Mr. John Smith existence, but at the same time if that Mr John Smith will not exists, it must include his not existence as well.

Is the IF condition that cannot be and must be at the same time.

 

Thinking about the Universe, our mind is lost after 1ms thinking to the concept of Universe, HI include and exclude any Universe not just one, but this is another discussion that is still relevant but if I continue we will go out of the track.

 

What is God? God exist and does not exist as well as our Mr John Smith. God to exist must include the Idea of John Smith, but at the same time must be also without it, or it will not be. In reality God is and is not at the same time for Mr John Smith.

 

The HI of God includes Mr John Smith, and excludes it. While God is for Mr John Smith and it cannot be not, this because Mr John Smith is a manifestation of the HI of God.

If you think to a sheet of a quad pad, God will be the sheet, Mr John Smith a single quad, this from the Mr. John Smith point of view. From God point of view, God is the whole pad with all the possible combination of the quad in it. From HI, and here is the point, there is not quad pad at all, and there are all at the same time, where again time is not and is.

 

From here we have three different concepts:

 1)   The hyper-Idea

 2)   God as idea

 3)   God as in relation with Mr. John Smith

 

We can understand the Mr. John Smith relation with God, and what the dependencies are. We can feel the Idea of God (as the heat of the Sun). We cannot in any way get close to the HI except as vague concept.

What is important for us is to relate ourselves with the God that we perceive as the rest of the single sheet. This because that is the only “dimension” we may relate to.

If a sheet looses a quad, the sheet will not be as sheet any longer, and that cannot be in the Idea of God.  At the same time the quad “does not exists” as such the Idea of the sheet is not affected by the lost because there is none.

 

But if the quad IS then it affect the sheet that must consider it, we can say that God exists only if Mr. John Smith exists, and God is in function of the quads that compose the whole quad pad.

So while as single quad we can relate only to God, as we perceive the sheet, as quads we all relate to the Idea of God so as pad. But that is as far as we can go, there is no way for us to reach the hyper-idea of God, which is the real dimension where God is and is not.

 

The reasoning express above is from some mind easy to catch, and for others absolutely impossible to follow. What is relevant is it will help us to better cover other topics related to what, is and/or is not our relation with God.

 

Ideas as self-determination, bad and good, existence and salvation are all to be considered under a different light, light that comes from us as part of the HI and nothing else.

At the same time concepts as religions, philosophy and science will re-arrange themselves, covering what they are suppose to cover and nothing more. What will be obvious is that the religion, no matter which, it will be drastically deflate to what it is for real.

 

Next article on self-determination and the Time concept.

renders_anonymous_mask

Dear all in Anonymous, I know that each one of you is free to follow his own direction and to promote freedom in each and any way each one think proper. As such I am not here to ask for a homogenization, or to limit the activity, on the contrary I am here to ask you to do more.

But let us start from the reason of why I felt the need to write this open letter.

Last week I was in Washington, and I had the chance to see and hear the local Anonymous propaganda. The black bus was park on the side road not far from the white house, and from hand-speaker the lady was once again raising questions and doubt about … 9/11 and the plain on the pentagon.

I agree we must keep the memory alive, and there is no too much need to say that all what had happened that day was a lie. Books, documents, investigations and special reports had shown that all what USA say about that day to the world was a lie (for any readers I suggest to read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Hoffman; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_controlled_demolition_conspiracy_theories; or for another bell the book from Thierry Meyssan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thierry_Meyssan L'Effroyable imposture; more also on the net just Google it).

We all know that the move was a milestone in the international governance to add control and pressure on the people.

We all had see how our last piece of freedom had gone away that day, we all still see how USA, UN and other governments lie using the term freedom and terrorism to manipulate information, action and pursue the economical interests of small lobby.

But that is exactly the point, governments and relative leaders, are just puppets.

No matter who is in charge at the white house, or in any other place of power, they are nothing more then smoke in the eye, and smoke is what we see when we fight and discuss about what they say or do. Smoke is also this or that document revealed, smoke is the name of the agent who shoots that guy, smoke is the crisis in Iraq, smoke is the recession in Europe, and smoke is the Ukraine crisis.

I am not saying that people is not suffering or worse dying, they are, but for the real power they count less then zero they are expendable, and are used to keep all of us away from the reality, away from what is really happening above us.

Follow the money should be the motto, see who is taking advantage of what is happening in the long term and how. See how these people connect and organize themselves, how they interact and what they command to the governments to do.

Name as Club Bilderberg is not an abstraction, it represent people like David Rockefeller (now 99 years old), Etienne Davignon,  Peter Sutherland, Franco Bernabe, Richard Hass and some other (younger) which are part of the team driving the show.

Names like Lakshmi Mittal, Philip Green, Ren Zhenfei, Ambami brothers, Harry Paulson, Roman Abramovic, Ratan Tata and Henry Paulson, may be less famous then Bill Gates, or Larry Ellison, but they are people who have their hands in critical sectors and that are by the fact involve in the big picture.

All of them are real people; people that we must take under the lens, because they are the ones who will make the next 9/11 or much worse to happen.

If there is a mission here is to keep the real power under control, stop wasting time with the puppets, stop follow the smoke, go to the wood before they will start the fire, put all the information out and allow all to know.

Knowledge is what we need to stop the decadence of the real freedom.

Thanks.

Latest conferences

We have 107 guests and no members online

oracle_ace