Home Marco's talks

Move to Italy

Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds

Blogs

Support Wikipedia

Login Form



Marco's Blog

Le mie opinioni espresse cosi come mi vengo se vi va le leggete se no ... no.

My ideas and consideration(s) if care read them if not I don't care.



Some reasoning around mirroring in MySQL PDF Print E-mail
Written by Marco Tusa   
Saturday, 13 May 2017 20:50

mirror1In the last year we had heard a lot of talking around ProxySQL and mirroring features. Frankly speaking the need to have a “mirroring” tool is something that comes up over and over. Question is “why so”?

The answer is that Mirroring is not an easy task, aside simplistic approaches, if we think carefully about it, we can easily realize that mirroring is not just pushing data from A to B.

When you look at yourself in in the mirror your image is not partial, you don’t miss an eye or part of the nose. What you see is the reflection of the whole face. If you smile or move your head, you will see the same behavior in the mirror, and if not, you will look for a poltergeist.

This is it, mirroring is not only reporting the image back, but also the movements, in some way the behavior.

If you smile a specific set of muscle will contract and other release to allow you that specific expression. A mirror will not do that, but it will mimic your face reflecting the light and showing what your body is doing in full.

Well that in Database transactions is not going to work so easily. We cannot easily mirror server A on server B, unless we will successful replicate B as a copy of A (easy?), and B also receiving exactly the same load in the same moment/time. Also if we succeed there initially, there are various non deterministic factor that will bring the two to diverge in the behavior, like network package transmission.

In datastore we have some level of Mirroring, but that is mainly passive mirroring. A volume is created and maintained as an exact copy of another, all independent behavior is suppressed, data is pass from A to B as it is, reads may happen.

In short, talking of mirroring for database behavior in real production environments, it is not only misleading but conceptually wrong, because we will always have a broken mirror image, like a face reflected without eyes and moving after or before we do. Who wants to have a mirror drive containing different data of its master?

But here the great things. Because the point is that we may not need mirroring at all. We may need something else, something actually more realistic and useful.

In the last years talking with customer and colleagues, what I heard over and over was the need to have of a tool that can allow to replicate, mimic the load of server A on server B.

This is slightly different from a Mirroring functionality, and another good news is that, this is actually achievable. Probably no tool will be able to replicate with 100% accuracy the load performed on a server to another but it would “good enough” to cover most of the cases.

What at then end we are talking about is to use a traffic/Load dispatcher. The tool does not pretend to mirror or mimic the original behavior, but it will use the original load to replicate it on the destination.

Just to mention Percona Playback was one of the tools that was going in that direction.

Anyhow, in my opinion there are 3 main cases where this “good enough” make sense:

  • Functional tests (Like to check if a query behave the same on server A and B)
  • Load comparison tests (to identify which server between A and B is managing the traffic better)
  • Empiric scalability test (Using traffic from A to multiply it and progressively Load B until saturation)

Also in this “simplified” approach we still have a lot to consider and be concerned.

For instance, in our point 1, also for a simple SELECT, we will need to be sure that collecting or redirecting the SELECT itself will not modify the behavior in A.

Secondly, we will receive a dataset from A, the application behavior will, eventually, adjust in regards to the received data.

But what about B? If the server B will send back the data set faster, should it wait for A? Or if for any reason (optimizer) we receive a different data set? Should we consider the differentiation as optimization or an error?

The easiest solution is to ignore B as whole but that may raise some consistency concern when performing full CRUD operations.

Another issue, and this is more related to point 2-3, what about transactions and data consistency?

Let say I have a transaction applying N different queries (again full CRUD model), should we ensure to have the same execution order in B as in A?

Should we respect the transaction isolation, the data validation against UK/FK, rollbacks and commit?

In my opinion the answer is YES, at least for whatever may change the data, we must ensure consistency.

Select can be “skip” but update/delete/insert cannot, and not to be too strict but for simple basic data consistency.

I think that at this point I had made my opinion clear.

Thanks to everybody.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 23 May 2017 13:12
 
La differenza c'e' PDF Print E-mail
Written by Marco Tusa   
Thursday, 28 April 2016 22:35

Brevi considerazioni intorno alla mia ultima visita in USA.

US-economic-collapse-321x370

La prima volta che ho visitato gli USA avevo 13 anni, quindi si parla del lontano 1976 o giù di li.

Mi ricordo ancora il primo impatto ed effetto che New York ebbe su di me. Io sino a quel momento avevo visto gli USA solo attraverso I film, televisione, qualche lettura e tanta disinformazione.

Camminare per le strade della citta e vedere la sporcizia, la povertà lo squallore che la citta portava con se fu per me un vero shock.

Con gli occhi di adolescente guardavo incredulo e sbigottito due persone prendersi a sprangate solo perché le macchine si erano tamponate, o gente indifferente alla sofferenza di una donna riversa a terra dopo essere stata derubata.

Si certo da noi non si scherzava, c'erano il terrorismo di stato con le brigate rosse, le lotte destra sinistra etc. ma sotto sotto eravamo ancora attenti alle persone.

Da quell'anno in poi sono tornato negli USA regolarmente una, due volte l'anno, e quando dico USA non dico New York, perché' crescendo ho avuto modo di girare molto il paese e vedere I vari aspetti. Stati del sud, interni, del nord e west. Insomma me la sono girata un bel po' e non come semplice turista fast-food, ma vivendoci e condividendo la vita quotidiana del paese che mi ospitava.

Ho visto una San Francisco magica, la nascita dell'era dot.com e la sua caduta. Ho partecipato in prima persona a momenti di forte unione durante le lotte e marce per combattere l'AIDS in un paese che non aveva problemi ad etichettare gay con demonio e AIDS con punizione divina.

Ho condiviso momenti intensissimi con alcuni mormoni in Salt Lake City.

Ed in fine ho visto la riserva di bellezze naturali ed umane che il paese nascondeva dietro una propaganda internazionale, scialba, fuorviante e spesso falsa fondata su quelli che erano I non valori degli USA invece che sui reali valori che hanno fondato il paese.

Insomma negli anni ho avuto modo di vedere bene tutto cio che c'era nel paese di bello, grande, magico, triste, disperato e a volte alienante. Ma tutto ciò era reale non finzione passata da propaganda.

Ed importante, alla base di tutto c'era un valore fondamentale, il riconoscimento della libertà individuale, il fatto che ciascuno di noi come essere umano abbia il diritto a perseguire la felicità, ed abbia gli stessi diritti e doveri.

Certo I poveri non erano scomparsi e cosi I senza tetto, e la loro presenza era riconosciuta ma a parte alcune isole (come New York) la comunità non era insensibile.

Poi, vennero I politicanti del petrolio, e con loro gli uomini in grigio. Gente che della liberta individuale non sa che farsene. Fecero di tutto per far si che il loro dio prendesse l'anima di tutti I cittadini, e lo fecero con un grande rituale sacrificale, più di tremila morti a New York e altri innumerevoli dopo per le guerre che ne scaturirono.

Tutto per potere e denaro. Ancora oggi siamo in Guerra a causa di quei poco di buono.

Io ho avuto modo di vedere passo passo la trasformazione di un paese che da essere promotore della liberta individuale, è passato ad essere promotore del super controllo globale col fine osservare, dirigere ed influenzare ogni singolo cittadino del paese (e del geoide terrestre).

Una popolazione che va a piedi è una popolazione facile da controllare.

Questo semplice concetto ha un valore metaforico, e si basa sul fatto che meno mobilita si consente, più stretti sono I lacci, più facile da influenzare sono le genti, non conta se la mobilità è fisica o metaforica e quindi culturale.

Il popolo USA, non è un popolo istruito, al contrario, la formazione/istruzione è stata declassata a tale punto, che solo coloro I quali hanno significanti risorse finanziare possono inviare I propri figli in strutture educative adeguate.

Inizialmente attribuivo questa mancanza al sistema educativo USA, molto dato dal fatto che discutendo con amici nel paese, in molti si lamento di un sistema non all'altezza, che informa in modo non adeguato. Ma dopo più approfondite ricerche ed analizzando sudi comparativi del sistema educativo nei G8, mi sono reso conto che sulla carta gli USA non brillano, ma non sono neanche messi così male come per esempio l'Italia o la Russia.

Ciò nonostante il divario tra giovani in Europa e nel continente nord Americano, è evidente a chiunque si voglia dare la briga di porre tre domande in croce ai rappresentanti dei due schieramenti.

È difficile per noi europei capire appieno quale sia la vastità della ignoranza che viene causata dal sistema (dis)educativo USA (Nord Americano).  Noi siamo abituati a camminare per le strade e respirare storia, le nostre radici si fondano su millenni di fatti che sono, in un modo od in un altro, ancora intorno a noi. Ci permeano, il nostro cervello, consapevole o meno si abituata ad assimilare l'arte, che attraverso I secoli ancora influenza il nostro modo di pensare e vivere.

In paesi come gli Stati Uniti, ed in versione più provinciale il Canda, l'arte come manifestazione quotidiana è totalmente assente. I ragazzi crescono in un ambiente che di per sé non è capace di stimolare la loro creatività per osmosi, ma deve essere direttamente indotta, appunto attraverso l'educazione/formazione.

Che il sistema USA sia informativo e NON formativo, e' evidenziato dal fatto che l'attenzione dei programmi educativi sono principalmente concentrati su alcuni segmenti, che non includono (se addirittura escludono) quel processo formativo che scaturisce dal fornire all'individuo la sensibilità per le arti, la storia, la filosofia.

A peggiorare le cose il fatto che le risorse siano state dirottate verso altri segmenti, quale quello militare, ha ridotto gli USA ad essere un paese dove il divario tra ricchezza e povertà (non solo economica ma spirituale) si sta allargando sempre di più, e la possibilità di "redenzione" dell'individuo, sta diventando sempre più rara, proprio perché gli mancano gli strumenti e la formazione.

imrs

 

È vero oggi abbiamo internet, e su essa viaggiano ogni giorno milioni di informazioni, ma l'informazione per sé non è abbastanza, ad essa deve essere accostata la capacità di analisi, analisi che per essere compiuta necessita di educazione, ovvero non solo informazione, ma formazione.

Leggere Facebook o postare immagini su un social o un altro, non è altro che un surrogato della umana necessita di condividere per creare e migliorare.

I social, come strumento, possono essere fondamentali nell'aiutare la popolazione mondiale non solo a condividere ma a creare, educare, e crescere. Ma non hanno valore alcuno, o molto inferiore, se vengono utilizzati come strumento egotistico.

Senza considerare poi che l'accesso alla piattaforma condivisa (internet), non è universale, ma anch'essa copre solo una certa fascia di individui.

Questo ci porta a tre grandi categorie, la prima quella che non ha accesso ad alcune sistema di informazione/formazione, né attraverso l'istruzione pubblica, né attraverso I media e nemmeno per osmosi.

La seconda, che non ha accesso ad una soddisfacente educazione ma ha accesso all'informazione.

La terza, in fine, che ha accesso all'educazione/formazione ed all'informazione. Quest'ultima in realtà è una classe veramente elitaria, nella quale gli individui sono esposti/sottoposti ad una educazione parallela, molto spesso mima di quello che avviene in Europa naturalmente.

La divisione di classe, ed il progressivo impoverimento culturale/formativo della classe media, unito con il crescente decadimento di valori a favore di un esasperante superficialità consumistica, ha portato gli USA ha divenire una potenza economico/militare che si basa su una ricchezza acquisita attraverso un sapere non totalmente rinnovabile.

I paesi europei sono ancora in tempo ad evitare di trovarsi nella medesima situazione, un po' come detto perché fortunatamente noi siamo condizionati dalla nostra storia, un po' perché non siamo ancora arrivati all'abbrutimento sociale ed educativo presente in USA.

Ma non è tutto lì, i programmi di studio nei gradi pre-universitari, sono talmente limitati che non sono comparabili alla istruzione Europea. Provate a chiedere ai ragazzi di 10 grado in USA circa la storia, geografia, filosofia o letteratura.

Il risultato è un evidente divario sociale e culturale che e stato proditoriamente causato al fine di avere una massa di individui dipendente da una minoranza, senza avere la capacità di capire la manipolazione che li porta ad essere, in ultima analisi, sacrificabili qualora non fruibili.

È questo il punto focale, al quale si è giunti oggi in USA (e non solo), punto che risulta evidente a chiunque si soffermi e faccia le dovute riflessioni.

Il sistema consumistico (non capitalistico) ha portato la maggiore parte degli individui di fascia due, ad essere fruibili, ovvero utilizzabili al fine di mantenere il sistema, attraverso il consumo e abuso di risorse, creando dipendenza e false necessità'. Tale che ad oggi il valore dell'individuo si calcola sul valore della sua capacità di consumo, non di produzione, non so se mi spiego.

Individui di fascia uno, rappresentano invece il serbatoio immediatamente sprecabile, il carico, spesso usato per dirottare l'attenzione della fascia 2, a ciò che la stessa non percepisca il vero divario, ovvero la sua distanza da chi invece si colloca in fascia tre. "Guarda loro come stanno male, meglio per te seguire quello che ti diciamo cosi avrai tutto quello che vuoi".

Nel medio evo, prima della nascita della borghesia, tale divisione di classi era evidente, ma la presenza umana era decisamente inferiore, e le risorse naturali tali da consentire una evoluzione verso l'avvicinamento delle classi. La capacità di produrre, di creare, di innovare erano tali che a fronte del volere fare, vi era la possibilità del fare stesso.

Oggi tale situazione si è invertita, e le risorse scarseggiano e scarseggeranno sempre di più, tanto che la divergenza tra classi non sarà solo basata su ricchezza effimera, ma su risorse base, quali cibo, acqua, cure mediche e come già avviene istruzione.

Falling in Line

 

Gli USA sono un colosso destinato a crollare, come l'impero romano, o la compagnia delle indie, gli USA spariranno dalla guida della nostra civiltà presto, molto presto.

Ma se non facciamo attenzione, il loro modello si trasferirà anche da noi portando anche l'Europa al collasso sociale, culturale ed economico.

european-values

Noi siamo ancora in tempo, abbiamo cioè la possibilità di invertire la tendenza, recuperando le basi della nostra cultura, promuovendo i valori sociali e formativi, investendo nel nostro futuro come comunità e non come individui assetati di potere.

L'annientamento di poteri economici centrali, quali la banca europea, il trasferimento agli stati sovrani della gestione della loro ricchezza, non è un impoverimento della comunità europea, al contrario, esso rappresenta l'unica alternativa per rivitalizzare l'investimento interno sull'unica risorsa che ha veramente senso, la nostra gente, i nostri figli, la nostra terra la nostra cultura e la nostra diversità culturale.

Il recupero di programmi formativi, non solo universitari ma anche professionali, ed artistici, l'investire nel sostenere ricerca scientifica, ed arti in generale, la rivalutazione delle tradizioni, delle culture locali, rivalutazione del territorio, intesa non come parafrasi dello sfruttamento, ma come recupero, restauro degli equilibri tra presenza umana e natura.

european_diversity

La riduzione dei consumi e della cultura dell'usa e getta, l'uso di energie rinnovabili, la riduzione degli sprechi energetici e di risorse, in fine la lotta capillare e rigorosa al malcostume e corruzione.

Tutto questo non rappresenta una separazione, ma un decentramento, che porta alla localizzazione delle risorse. Rafforzando il legame tra chi ha la responsabilità di gestione, e chi ha delegato tale responsabilità.

Come detto, noi siamo ancora in tempo, ma per poco, ora o mai più.

Per chi crede ancora che viviamo ai tempi dell'albero della "cuccagna" vorrei potere organizzare viaggi informativi, non nei paesi del terzo mondo, ma negli USA, e mostrare loro cosa sta veramente accadendo dietro le quinte, ed il livello di accelerazione al quale sta accadendo.

Ricordatevi, gli USA crolleranno, ma se noi non saremo pronti, crolleremo con loro, e non sarà un bel vivere, ma un bagno di sangue, letteralmente.

Last Updated on Thursday, 28 April 2016 23:13
 
The sliding door effect PDF Print E-mail
Written by Marco Tusa   
Monday, 29 February 2016 01:29

 

The sliding door effect …

Every day we take thousands decisions, some of them are minor like what to drink tea or coffee? Others are more relevant and involve our interactions with other human being. For every decision our brain is presenting us millions, billions of relevant facts store I our memory, some times the facts have a consolidated history some other times they don’t.

 

I know I like coffee more than tea, this is also confirmed by the number of them I had enjoy in the past, a number that is significantly higher than the teas I had. But I know as well that I prefer a good tea to a mediocre coffee.

As such when I choose what to drink, my brain presents me all the information regarding my taste, my past experiences, my geographic location (am I in a place where the coffee is god or not), finally it analyzes the information related to that specific moment. Is the guy at the coffee machine doing good or he looks not really on the subject?

 

As said, billions on information to recover, analyze and present in seconds or less than that. For a coffee!!!

 

Guess what, in our day we have to take decisions that are much more complex than that, and unless you are totally nuts, you do not use a coin to decide what to do.

 

To make things even worse, the more you grow, the more your data bank expand, the more your brain has material to choose coffee or tea.

In some case that will make the decision faster, in other it will make it much, much longer.

 

On top of that there are millions of decisions that, let say it, do not count.

Nothing will change in your life if you choose the tea instead of coffee, unless … Well unless that is one of the “sliding door” moment.

 

What is a “sliding door” moment? If you have seen the movie with Gwyneth Paltrow in 1998, you already know, if not I will explain in a second.

 

There are few moments in our life where a series of possible events converge, they normally converge in very simple day by day action, but the context is not the usual.

Something sounds strange, something is different. Most of the time when this happens we do not realize it right away, we do after.

Those are the moment where we say to ourselves, “What if?”.

 

What if instead decide to prune a small branch of that tree I had decided to … don’t do it.

Well I would not injury my neck with the risk to remain paraplegic for the rest of my life, and I would not marry my first wife, and … So on and on and on.

In short, my life would had been totally different, ONLY IF.

 

Why I am saying all this? Because recently I had found myself in front of three of the most difficult questions I had to answer. That in combination with a series of events that bring me to raise my old antennas, and perceive, more then see that I was going to hit one “sliding door” moment.

The questions in discussion are something that in one or another moment in our life we had already face.

Well at least I did.

But all together in this specific moment of my life, they had a totally different impact and meaning.

 

The questions are:

  • Do you know who you are?
  • Do you understand what has happened to you?
  • Do you want to live this way?

What was interesting for me was and still is, that those questions, raise in the exact moment in which I was in front of my “sliding door” moment. In that exact moment I realized that my brain, who was filling me with information and driving me to take one decision or another, simply stops. It stops to push, stop to provide suggestions, it focus on NOT to give an answer. It focuses on NOT making that moment, a “sliding door” one.

 

I could stay days, or seconds now analyzing the data and try to make a better decision. That moment is gone, and this is good.

 

It is good because I can now first answer to more important and relevant questions.

Who am I (now, after X years)?

How it can be that I am here, what really happened to ME ( I mean the “ME”)

Is this the life I had choose to live, or I had left it to bring me in a different place?

 

Not the first time I raise these questions to myself, but I have to say, this time is different. As mentioned before, we often raise one of them to our attention, and we provide an answer. Evaluate what to do and so on.

It also may happen that we ask all three of them, in a moment that is a moment, but not a “sliding door” moment.

 

I had hit that special situation, and my “sliding door” moment become, not to choose A or B, but between ignore the questions or take them, accept that they will, once more, oblige me to change the direction of my life.

 

I know what to do, and in many ways I am scare, because in order to DO IT, I have to go to the longer road, I need to have a lot of courage, and once more be ready for the difficult moments that for sure will come.

But this is life.

 

The only thing I can say, is life is courage, and there is more courage in being honest when answering the above questions, than in performing any scaring or extreme activity.

 

I am writing all this, to share, share an important moment, and take the opportunity to raise to all of you my friends three simple questions:

  • Do you know who you are?
  • Do you understand what has happened to you?
  • Do you want to live this way?
Last Updated on Monday, 29 February 2016 01:32
 
Digression around God (part 1). PDF Print E-mail
Written by Marco Tusa   
Monday, 18 August 2014 00:13

 

eye-of-god-in-blue-10First of all I should have wrote this in Italian, because English it is not my mother tongue and as such I will not be as clear as I would like, and probably I will not be able to use all the terms I am in desire to.

But if I write this in Italian I know that only one, may be two people will get what I am talking about. In English the hope is to have at least 4 or 5 that will be able to follow.

 

 

 

 

 

Preface

Normally in any book or article that talk about something complex, the final idea or conclusion is relegate to the end, while the whole write is mainly focus on explaining the reasoning that leads the writer to that.

I will not follow it, and in fact I will start with what should be the conclusion.

 

What about God

God doesn’t exist, easy as that, period.

Why God does not exist is another discussion. The first point is to understand a very easy concept, society culture, religions and history had taught us to think to God as something existing, but that at the same time it is over-existence.

 

So in some way we were lead to think that God, is some entity, existing but not as we do, existing in a different scale of time, space, dimension and realization.

God represent the point from which existence starts, from which all the things that are begin.

This with a very good level of generalization is the mantra that all the religions repeat to everybody from when the time starts.

Having spent 37 years studying religions, philosophy and science I can see that this common focal point is, to be explicit, bullshit.

 

If God is, then there is a moment when God is not. If God is the source of everything, then there must be a nothing that is not God, and so on we can review one by one all the pillars of almost all religions and find that the basic concept is mainly his own contradiction.

So what about God? If we stop to think to God as entity or as existing than we are on the right path. The hyper-idea of what is and what is not, of time and no time of potential and act, is what could be the more close definition of God, but given a definition will include something that can be out of it than the term is, again, not correct.

 

The hyper-idea concept is something difficult for the human mind to understand, because we are lead to think following a line of time. While here to feel what I mean you should perceive the time as a whole and not as a moment.

You can perceive the heat of the sun, but that is not the sun “per se” also if it is the sun.

The hyper-idea includes what it is and what it is not; given it hyper as such it is and is not at the same time, given time is and is not as well.

The hyper-idea (HI) must include all and exclude all at the same time. Just to clarify with a simple example. HI must include the Mr. John Smith existence, but at the same time if that Mr John Smith will not exists, it must include his not existence as well.

Is the IF condition that cannot be and must be at the same time.

 

Thinking about the Universe, our mind is lost after 1ms thinking to the concept of Universe, HI include and exclude any Universe not just one, but this is another discussion that is still relevant but if I continue we will go out of the track.

 

What is God? God exist and does not exist as well as our Mr John Smith. God to exist must include the Idea of John Smith, but at the same time must be also without it, or it will not be. In reality God is and is not at the same time for Mr John Smith.

 

The HI of God includes Mr John Smith, and excludes it. While God is for Mr John Smith and it cannot be not, this because Mr John Smith is a manifestation of the HI of God.

If you think to a sheet of a quad pad, God will be the sheet, Mr John Smith a single quad, this from the Mr. John Smith point of view. From God point of view, God is the whole pad with all the possible combination of the quad in it. From HI, and here is the point, there is not quad pad at all, and there are all at the same time, where again time is not and is.

 

From here we have three different concepts:

 1)   The hyper-Idea

 2)   God as idea

 3)   God as in relation with Mr. John Smith

 

We can understand the Mr. John Smith relation with God, and what the dependencies are. We can feel the Idea of God (as the heat of the Sun). We cannot in any way get close to the HI except as vague concept.

What is important for us is to relate ourselves with the God that we perceive as the rest of the single sheet. This because that is the only “dimension” we may relate to.

If a sheet looses a quad, the sheet will not be as sheet any longer, and that cannot be in the Idea of God.  At the same time the quad “does not exists” as such the Idea of the sheet is not affected by the lost because there is none.

 

But if the quad IS then it affect the sheet that must consider it, we can say that God exists only if Mr. John Smith exists, and God is in function of the quads that compose the whole quad pad.

So while as single quad we can relate only to God, as we perceive the sheet, as quads we all relate to the Idea of God so as pad. But that is as far as we can go, there is no way for us to reach the hyper-idea of God, which is the real dimension where God is and is not.

 

The reasoning express above is from some mind easy to catch, and for others absolutely impossible to follow. What is relevant is it will help us to better cover other topics related to what, is and/or is not our relation with God.

 

Ideas as self-determination, bad and good, existence and salvation are all to be considered under a different light, light that comes from us as part of the HI and nothing else.

At the same time concepts as religions, philosophy and science will re-arrange themselves, covering what they are suppose to cover and nothing more. What will be obvious is that the religion, no matter which, it will be drastically deflate to what it is for real.

 

Next article on self-determination and the Time concept.

Last Updated on Monday, 18 August 2014 00:26
 
Open letter to Anonymous PDF Print E-mail
Written by Marco Tusa   
Monday, 18 August 2014 00:01

renders_anonymous_mask

Dear all in Anonymous, I know that each one of you is free to follow his own direction and to promote freedom in each and any way each one think proper. As such I am not here to ask for a homogenization, or to limit the activity, on the contrary I am here to ask you to do more.

But let us start from the reason of why I felt the need to write this open letter.

Last week I was in Washington, and I had the chance to see and hear the local Anonymous propaganda. The black bus was park on the side road not far from the white house, and from hand-speaker the lady was once again raising questions and doubt about … 9/11 and the plain on the pentagon.

I agree we must keep the memory alive, and there is no too much need to say that all what had happened that day was a lie. Books, documents, investigations and special reports had shown that all what USA say about that day to the world was a lie (for any readers I suggest to read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Hoffman; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_controlled_demolition_conspiracy_theories; or for another bell the book from Thierry Meyssan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thierry_Meyssan L'Effroyable imposture; more also on the net just Google it).

We all know that the move was a milestone in the international governance to add control and pressure on the people.

We all had see how our last piece of freedom had gone away that day, we all still see how USA, UN and other governments lie using the term freedom and terrorism to manipulate information, action and pursue the economical interests of small lobby.

But that is exactly the point, governments and relative leaders, are just puppets.

No matter who is in charge at the white house, or in any other place of power, they are nothing more then smoke in the eye, and smoke is what we see when we fight and discuss about what they say or do. Smoke is also this or that document revealed, smoke is the name of the agent who shoots that guy, smoke is the crisis in Iraq, smoke is the recession in Europe, and smoke is the Ukraine crisis.

I am not saying that people is not suffering or worse dying, they are, but for the real power they count less then zero they are expendable, and are used to keep all of us away from the reality, away from what is really happening above us.

Follow the money should be the motto, see who is taking advantage of what is happening in the long term and how. See how these people connect and organize themselves, how they interact and what they command to the governments to do.

Name as Club Bilderberg is not an abstraction, it represent people like David Rockefeller (now 99 years old), Etienne Davignon,  Peter Sutherland, Franco Bernabe, Richard Hass and some other (younger) which are part of the team driving the show.

Names like Lakshmi Mittal, Philip Green, Ren Zhenfei, Ambami brothers, Harry Paulson, Roman Abramovic, Ratan Tata and Henry Paulson, may be less famous then Bill Gates, or Larry Ellison, but they are people who have their hands in critical sectors and that are by the fact involve in the big picture.

All of them are real people; people that we must take under the lens, because they are the ones who will make the next 9/11 or much worse to happen.

If there is a mission here is to keep the real power under control, stop wasting time with the puppets, stop follow the smoke, go to the wood before they will start the fire, put all the information out and allow all to know.

Knowledge is what we need to stop the decadence of the real freedom.

Thanks.

Last Updated on Monday, 18 August 2014 00:27
 
«StartPrev12345678NextEnd»

Page 1 of 8
 

Connecting from

Your IP: 54.162.168.187

Location:

Who's Online

We have 70 guests online